And they call it an "independent" nuclear deterrent
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
And they call it an "independent" nuclear deterrent
I just saw it on the news, and found this via Google:
It's often said that that one of the advantages of staying in the UK is that it enables us to be a power on the world stage. But something like this will make it look like the UK has no real power, and is just in the pocket of the US. Because it's true. It will make a mockery of the UK's credibility on the world stage ... because it is one more reason why any UK government cannot afford to take a position that differs from that of the Americans.AWE Aldermaston now in US hands
Posted by jossc on 19 December 2008
Trident - costs and 'independence' are both spinning out of control
The management of the Atomic Weapons Establishment at Aldermaston, the 'bomb factory' which makes and maintains the UK's nuclear warheads, is now controlled by private US companies following the sale of the government's 33 per cent holding yesterday.
The news, a further nail in the coffin of the flimsy pretence that Britain has an independent nuclear deterent, only came to light in a three line press statement released by BNFL, the state-owned group which officially 'owned' the government's stake.
The government itself made no official announcement, either in Parliament, through the Ministry of Defence, or the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (DBERR), which oversaw the sale. Since it still owns the land on which AWE sits, plus a 'golden share' in holding company AWE plc, it thinks that it can maintain the fiction that this development doesn't indicate a further merging of the UK and US weapons programmes.
http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/blog/peace/awe-aldermaston-now-us-hands-20081219
Aggressive Voltage- Posts : 10
Join date : 2008-11-26
Re: And they call it an "independent" nuclear deterrent
Nick Harvey of the Lib Dems made a point in the Independent's version of the story:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/secret-nuclear-selloff-storm-1204979.html
He said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_US-UK_Mutual_Defence_Agreement
The Non-Proliferation Treaty is a bit of a joke anyway. It placed an obligation on the then five nuclear powers to disarm, something they have never seriously tried to do.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/secret-nuclear-selloff-storm-1204979.html
He said:
Not sure about that. Britain and the US have been technology-sharing ever since 1958The whole argument used for Britain having a separate weapons establishment is that this is required by the [nuclear] non-proliferation treaty, as technology-sharing is not allowed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958_US-UK_Mutual_Defence_Agreement
The Non-Proliferation Treaty is a bit of a joke anyway. It placed an obligation on the then five nuclear powers to disarm, something they have never seriously tried to do.
Aderyn y Si- Posts : 18
Join date : 2008-11-14
Re: And they call it an "independent" nuclear deterrent
I once met a man, working for Logica (as was I) who had been in charge of 'Quality Control' on the Arian 5 mission (you remember - the one that went up a bit, then cam down quite a bit faster!) . He didn't like it when I laughed. he said 'My bit Worked!'.
That was the one where one lot were working in SI, the other in Imperial. Quality?
That was the one where one lot were working in SI, the other in Imperial. Quality?
sionnyn- Posts : 6
Join date : 2009-04-29
Similar topics
» How Wales could be better off independent
» "A (D)evolving Criminal Justice System for Wales"
» New Nuclear Plant at Yr Wylfa
» Proposition: "To be truly Welsh, you have to be white."
» Bilingual Juries
» "A (D)evolving Criminal Justice System for Wales"
» New Nuclear Plant at Yr Wylfa
» Proposition: "To be truly Welsh, you have to be white."
» Bilingual Juries
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum